9 Ways Animal Rescue Martyrdom Hurts The Cause

Martyrdom is "suffering endured for sake of a cause."

‍

Martyrdom in Animal Rescue has been a present philosophy for a long time - partly out of necessity in order to grab attention.

‍

In the age of social media and lightning-fast communication, the explosion of and overarching embracement and celebration of Martyrdom in Animal Rescue and Welfare hurts the cause.

‍

Martyrdom presents itself in several ways important to consider - if we want to see change in the Animal Rescue space.

• Animal Rescue and Welfare as a "cause" vs a valid community, city, state, and federal responsibility
• Allowance for and encouragement of extremism
• Unpaid Labor pride and lauding
• Insolvent business operations
• Savior Complex Media Onslaught specifically designed to take advantage of well-meaning humans who want to help. Savvy Tragedy Narrative / Savior Complex marketing is most of what you see from fundraising rescues and organizations. This distracts - it pulls audience from the daily grind work of helping healthy, adoptable dogs and cats find a new home as well as working on the core problems to combat the overpopulation crisis. To be competitive, essentially everyone must publish this type of content, currently, to compete for eyeballs.

‍

9 Ways Animal Rescue Martyrdom Hurts The Cause

‍

1. TALENT POOL LIMITATION

Beyond the small fraction of solvent animal rescue organizations which pay employees a fair, living wage - much of the important work is volunteer. This limits the animal rescue workforce to specific socioeconomic statuses creating a lack of diversity to work on the core issues in a meaningful way. In terms of "working for free" - this portion of the labor pool is primarily privileged white women (hello Real Housewives of Animal Rescue).

‍

2. UNQUALIFIED BUSINESS LEADERSHIP

A non-profit for which live animals are handled, especially those where medical or behavioral expertise and experience is needed, should require licensing and proof of ability and capability to care for the animals. This is not the case. People with no business experience or advanced animal responsibility training are free to open a non-profit rescue from their home. There is no regulation in the animal non-profit space and ample corruption. It is simple to take advantage of well-meaning supporters with embellished or invented narrative, for example. See: Animal Rescue Theater for information and case studies.

‍

3. UNRELIABLE STABILITY

With most animal rescue-centered businesses relying on donations and volunteer labor, and this being the common expectation, longterm commitment and stability is always in jeopardy. This is especially concerning when a roster of animals is dependent upon that business.

‍

4. DESPERATE FUNDRAISING AS THE NORM

Martyrdom and Tragedy Narrative content must be leaned into harder, with more extreme-need cases showcased, in an effort to boost attention and donations. This can become an endless cycle and the animals are the losers. This type of communication is fatiguing to most mentally-stable humans - they cannot continue to consume it. Therefore, it turns people away from seeing rescue animals needing homes or supporting the cause. See: Animal Rescue Theater.

‍

5. MARKETING OF MARTYRDOM DOLLARS

From the micros to the established, large organizations - a large portion of budget and time is spent on marketing which showcases do-gooder "proof" vs that budget going towards the work. This marketing proof is more effective if it is, for example, an extreme case of neglect or medical need VS accomplishment of high volume spay and neuter or healthy, adoptable dog placements.

‍

6. BURNOUT

Martyrdom encourages the workforce to push themselves to the edge of their available time, heart, and physical efforts until burnout and sometimes even suicide happens. It is important to recognize the signs of compassion fatigue and address issues before they lead to anger, overwhelming sadness, erratic behavior, or worse.

‍

7. ONLINE HARASSMENT

With animal rescue considered to be a "cause" versus a "real business" for which experienced, knowledgeable, and trained people should be leading efforts with fair compensation - there is much judgement, hate, and jealousy. This generates competition for who is doing "the most" with "the least" and manifests trolling, bullying, campaigns of attack, and blacklisting of people who are doing incredibly impactful work. Cyberbullying killed incredible wildlife rescuer Mikayla Raines of Save a Fox Rescue who took her own life in the summer of 2025.

‍

8. TALENT EXIT

The work is brutal and there are no breaks in the volume of need. Jumping into a cushier non-profit scenario or another industry is almost always going to mean a higher salary with much less stress. When Martyrdom is wanted and expected from peers and the public, talent exit is inevitable.

‍

9. ANIMALS VULNERABLE TO EMOTIONAL MANEUVERS

This is the most important point and the (very unfortunate) bottom line. People can get obsessed and addicted to Martyrdom which can create scenarios where it is more about showcasing and celebrating "heroic," heart-tugging stories VS quality and quantity help for the animals. Especially when there is considerable monetary support in play based on the Tragedy Narrative media showcasing by any given business.

‍

‍

The mindset of what it means to work in the Animal Rescue and Welfare space needs to change.

‍

Martyrdom severely limits the talent pool, longevity of focused effort, and consistency of follow through across the entire animal rescue landscape.

‍

Constant verbiage such as "save" and "hero," in Animal Rescue marketing readily triggers and encourages martyrdom philosophy. Language is an easy place to implement a shift to the needed change. Words matter. Instead of "Daisy needs a hero" - consider communicating she needs a human, a home, a happy tale (tail). Instead of "Who will save Rupert?" - consider Who is Rupert's match? Who needs some Rupert in their life? Is Rupert your missing piece? Etc.

‍

If we had a consistent, stable, focused, aligned, capable workforce without such high turnover and exit - maybe we would not be in the ongoing, pervasive dog overpopulation crisis which costs hundreds of thousands of healthy, adoptable dogs their lives every single year.

‍

Do we want to fix the problem?

Or just keep perpetuating the same?

Nothing changes if nothing changes.

It's time for change.

‍

For further insight on this issue, see Ed Boks's August 19, 2025 piece: "The Business of a Never-Ending Crisis: Why the Pet Overpopulation Crisis Has Become Too Profitable to Solve." (Animal Politics with Ed Boks)